<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Open Source Brand in the Right Hands?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/03/20/is-the-open-source-brand-in-the-right-hands/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/03/20/is-the-open-source-brand-in-the-right-hands/</link>
	<description>Linux, Open Source and Social Media</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory &#187; In the OSI board we (must) trust</title>
		<link>http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/03/20/is-the-open-source-brand-in-the-right-hands/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory &#187; In the OSI board we (must) trust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/03/20/is-the-open-source-brand-in-the-right-hands/#comment-589</guid>
		<description>[...] has been to shed some light on the workings of the OSI and its elections. Mark Hinkle recently took a look at the OSI&#8217;s bylaws (which to be fair have always been available for everyone to see) and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been to shed some light on the workings of the OSI and its elections. Mark Hinkle recently took a look at the OSI&#8217;s bylaws (which to be fair have always been available for everyone to see) and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Open Source (Ideas) Can Win the War and Save the Auto Industry</title>
		<link>http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/03/20/is-the-open-source-brand-in-the-right-hands/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>How Open Source (Ideas) Can Win the War and Save the Auto Industry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/03/20/is-the-open-source-brand-in-the-right-hands/#comment-310</guid>
		<description>[...] to products that are free though not open source. It?s a classic marketing maneuver to leverage a brand that already has broad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to products that are free though not open source. It?s a classic marketing maneuver to leverage a brand that already has broad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/03/20/is-the-open-source-brand-in-the-right-hands/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/03/20/is-the-open-source-brand-in-the-right-hands/#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Tanner, 

Thanks for the history lesson. I didn't realize they had tried to trademark it in the past. You not old just well seasoned ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tanner, </p>
<p>Thanks for the history lesson. I didn&#8217;t realize they had tried to trademark it in the past. You not old just well seasoned <img src='http://socializedsoftware.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanner Lovelace</title>
		<link>http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/03/20/is-the-open-source-brand-in-the-right-hands/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanner Lovelace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/03/20/is-the-open-source-brand-in-the-right-hands/#comment-262</guid>
		<description>&#62;&#62;&#62; "They control–though not challenged under law–the Open Source trademark.  A quick search at the USPTO shows that open source is not a registered trademark for software."

My how quickly history is forgotten.  OSI did, in fact, try to trademark the term "Open Source" for software however it was rejected almost 9 years ago[1][2]!  Does the fact that I remember this first hand mean I'm old or just that I'm a better follower of Santayana[3]?

Also, it's kind of curious to see Bruce trying to get back into OSI after he "left in anger" before[4]. It will be interesting to see how that plays out.

[1] http://old.lwn.net/1999/0617/
[2] http://old.lwn.net/1999/0617/a/opensource.html
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Santayana
[4] http://lwn.net/2000/0810/backpage.php3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8220;They control–though not challenged under law–the Open Source trademark.  A quick search at the USPTO shows that open source is not a registered trademark for software.&#8221;</p>
<p>My how quickly history is forgotten.  OSI did, in fact, try to trademark the term &#8220;Open Source&#8221; for software however it was rejected almost 9 years ago[1][2]!  Does the fact that I remember this first hand mean I&#8217;m old or just that I&#8217;m a better follower of Santayana[3]?</p>
<p>Also, it&#8217;s kind of curious to see Bruce trying to get back into OSI after he &#8220;left in anger&#8221; before[4]. It will be interesting to see how that plays out.</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://old.lwn.net/1999/0617/"  rel="nofollow">http://old.lwn.net/1999/0617/</a><br />
[2] <a href="http://old.lwn.net/1999/0617/a/opensource.html"  rel="nofollow">http://old.lwn.net/1999/0617/a/opensource.html</a><br />
[3] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Santayana"  rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Santayana</a><br />
[4] <a href="http://lwn.net/2000/0810/backpage.php3"  rel="nofollow">http://lwn.net/2000/0810/backpage.php3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mindcrime</title>
		<link>http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/03/20/is-the-open-source-brand-in-the-right-hands/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>mindcrime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/03/20/is-the-open-source-brand-in-the-right-hands/#comment-261</guid>
		<description>I'm supporting Bruce, but I'm not sure it matters much at this point.  The OSI has lost all of their credibility already, and nobody really cares about their license certification.  With their little board and it's nepotism and inbreeding, they aren't likely to make any substantive move to correct that, so I'm almost tempted to say the best thing to do is stand back, watch OSI die, and then form a newer, better organization in the future to fill a similar role.  

Ideally we should put somebody like Bruce Perens at the forefront; and then come up with a real open, community driven governance model and implement some safeguards against vendor dominance of the governance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m supporting Bruce, but I&#8217;m not sure it matters much at this point.  The OSI has lost all of their credibility already, and nobody really cares about their license certification.  With their little board and it&#8217;s nepotism and inbreeding, they aren&#8217;t likely to make any substantive move to correct that, so I&#8217;m almost tempted to say the best thing to do is stand back, watch OSI die, and then form a newer, better organization in the future to fill a similar role.  </p>
<p>Ideally we should put somebody like Bruce Perens at the forefront; and then come up with a real open, community driven governance model and implement some safeguards against vendor dominance of the governance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is the Open Source Brand in the Right Hands? &#124; Guide Open Source</title>
		<link>http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/03/20/is-the-open-source-brand-in-the-right-hands/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Is the Open Source Brand in the Right Hands? &#124; Guide Open Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/03/20/is-the-open-source-brand-in-the-right-hands/#comment-259</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest of this great post here     Author:    Time: Thursday, March 20th, 2008 at 10:49 pm   Category: Open Source   Comments: You [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest of this great post here     Author:    Time: Thursday, March 20th, 2008 at 10:49 pm   Category: Open Source   Comments: You [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
